Docket Number: PHMSA-2019-0066

Docket Number: PHMSA-2017-0069

Appellant was assessed a civil penalty of $9,375 in three payments of $3,125 for one violation of the HMR when it when it offered for transportation, in commerce, an unapproved explosive, not tested, classed, and approved.

Docket Number: PHMSA-2017-0050

Docket Number: PHMSA-2017-0032

Docket Number: PHMSA-2016-0051

Docket Number: PHMSA-2017-0015

Docket Number: PHMSA-2012-0194

On May 22, 1996, the Chief Counsel issued an Order to Applied Companies, Inc. (Respondent) assessing a penalty in the amount of $3,920 for two violations of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR). (Violation No. 1) The Order found that Respondent knowingly represented, marked, certified, offered, and sold compressed gas cylinders as meeting the requirements of the HMR when hydrostatic testing had been performed on equipment having a pressure gauge that was not capable of being read within one percent of test pressure, and (violation No.

On September 17, 1996, the Chief Counsel issued an Order to Amarillo Testing and Equipment, Inc. (Respondent) assessing a penalty in the amount of $7,700 for three violations of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR). (1): Respondent had knowingly: (1) transported in commerce a package containing radioactive materials without assuring that the package was in unimpaired physical condition and that each closure was properly secured and free from all defects (violation No.

On January 8, 1997, the Chief Counsel issued an Order to Eagle X-Ray of Texas, Inc. (Respondent) assessing a penalty in the amount of $5,800 for three violations of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR). The Order found that the Respondent knowingly offered for transportation in commerce special form radioactive material without being registered with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) as a party to the NRC package approval(violation No.