Docket Order: PHMSA-2012-0115

Respondent was assessed a civil penalty of $11,300 for violations of the HMR when it manufactured, marked, and certified steel pails as meeting a UN performance standard in the HMR for use in transportation of hazardous material when design qualification testing of the drum design types had not been performed (violation No. 1), and it marked and certified steel pails as having removable heads and meeting a UN performance standard in the HMR for use in transportation of hazardous material when the pails had non-removable heads.

Docket Order: PHMSA-2012-0115

Respondent was assessed a civil penalty of $11,300 for violations of the HMR when it manufactured, marked, and certified steel pails as meeting a UN performance standard in the HMR for use in transportation of hazardous material when design qualification testing of the drum design types had not been performed (violation No. 1), and it marked and certified steel pails as having removable heads and meeting a UN performance standard in the HMR for use in transportation of hazardous material when the pails had non-removable heads.

Docket Order: PHMSA-2012-0109

See decision on appeal.

Docket Order: PHMSA-2012-0101

Respondent was assessed a civil penalty of $11,500 for two violations of the HMR when it offered for transportation in commerce a flammable liquid hazardous material in a packaging which was not authorized for this material and in packagings that were not marked with the proper shipping name and UN identification number for this material.

Docket Order: PHMSA-2012-0097

Respondent was assessed a civil penalty of $5,400 for one violation of the HMR when it offered for transportation in commerce by vessel a motor vehicle powered by an internal combustion engine using liquid fuel that has a flash point less than 38ºC (100ºF), a hazardous material, when the fuel tank was not empty and the engine had not been run until it stalled for lack of fuel, without declaring the vehicle as a hazardous material or meeting the conditions for an exception from other requirements in the HMR.

Docket Order: PHMSA-2012-0075

Docket Order: PHMSA-2012-0134

Docket Order: PHMSA-2012-0096

Docket Order: PHMSA-2012-0035

See decision on appeal.

Docket Order: PHMSA-2012-0037

Respondent was assessed a civil penalty of $8,150 for two violations of the HMR when it offered for transportation in commerce fireworks, explosive hazardous materials, which had not been tested, and had not been classed and approved by PHMSA (violation No. 1), and when it did not describe the materials as required on a shipping paper and it failed to maintain copies of shipping papers (violation No. 2).